Timeline for Are questions about replicability, open-science, and meta-science on topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2016 at 3:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCogSci/status/741469976322801664 | ||
| Jun 9, 2016 at 14:12 | comment | added | Josh | Yes, please! As long as the questions touch on how these areas impact the psychology literature, they should certainly be on topic here. And I would argue that any discussion of methods that are related to the psychology literature should be on topic as well. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 22:17 | comment | added | jsakaluk | Yeah, I am aware of Academia--I just don't think that is a topically focused enough forum for the needs of the community of scholars I am referring to. Anyways, I'll look forward to seeing what the Cognitive Sciences community thinks about the inclusion of this topic. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 22:15 | comment | added | AliceD | Thanks! I'll go through your question more thoroughly later +1, but for now I'd like to point out Academia.SE for broad questions that only touch upon CogSci. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 22:12 | comment | added | jsakaluk | Sure--updated my answer with more content and some of the formatting you asked for. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 22:12 | history | edited | jsakaluk | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Bolded question; added examples of what kinds of questions might be representative of the topic(s) in question |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 19:37 | comment | added | AliceD | Could you give some focused examples and bold-out the core of your question? I don't really seem to grasp where you are heading here, especially so given the answer of Steven below. Your question couldn't come more timely, given the current developments of this site. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 19:12 | answer | added | Steven JeurisMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 19:00 | history | asked | jsakaluk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |