Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • $\begingroup$ The only thing I can think of is doing the perspective projection on the CPU, and using an ortho matrix... Does that work? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2016 at 14:07
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ why not use glsl? You are going to need to learn to program a shader eventually why not now. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2016 at 14:54
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It should be possible to do this using projective texture mapping, which can be done in fixed-function by providing 4-dimensional texcoords. I'd have to sit down and do the math to work out the details though. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2016 at 16:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nathan's right - you can undo perspective projection with a 4th coordinate (I too would have to work out the math); look into texture coordinate generation. I have vague memories that on (very) old hardware precision can crop up as an issue (I think implementing stipple this way was error prone - I never had to do it personally) - so if old hardware is why you're not able to use shaders, you may bump into some oddities at the pixel level. But it is a better approach, especially if you have alot of geometry or if you are using vertex buffers. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2016 at 12:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you figured it out yourself, you might want to answer you own question then. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2017 at 16:16