Timeline for Status of review queues
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2023 at 2:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 18, 2023 at 1:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBotStaff | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 20, 2022 at 1:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBotStaff | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 23, 2022 at 0:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBotStaff | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 23:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBotStaff | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 24, 2021 at 23:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBotStaff | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 27, 2021 at 22:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBotStaff | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 27, 2021 at 22:02 | answer | added | Nike Dattani | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 5, 2021 at 20:34 | comment | added | Nathaniel | I am pretty new to review first posts, but here's my opinion on the topic: when I try go to the review queue, I often see first posts that are already edited/commented so I don't quite see the point to do something. When browsing newly active questions, I already edit/comment them if necessary without doing so via the review queue. Why not automatically remove a post from the review queue if it is already edited/commented by someone above a certain threshold of reputation? (dunno if that's easy to do, though) | |
| Apr 2, 2021 at 7:28 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | It's down to zero! | |
| Mar 28, 2021 at 19:28 | comment | added | Juho | I'll try to do a little more in the coming days as well. | |
| Mar 28, 2021 at 19:25 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | It seems to be happening on its own. | |
| Mar 28, 2021 at 19:20 | comment | added | Juho | Thanks for raising the issue Yuval. I go through the queue every now and then, but I usually have only looked at close votes for no particular reason. Maybe we should do a coordinated effort to go through the queues? | |
| Mar 24, 2021 at 8:25 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | A related question: do we have three active moderators? | |
| Mar 24, 2021 at 7:27 | comment | added | Ainsley H. | Maybe we could write down something (here?) that sets out the "rules" of what moderators can and should do with a post? I'm often afraid I'm taking it too far with my edits... | |
| Mar 24, 2021 at 6:01 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Mar 24, 2021 at 5:59 | comment | added | D.W. Mod | @PålGD, it's up to you. My impression is that the purpose of first-post review is to help folks who are here to guide them on how to be successful on this site. So, you could make improvements yourself; or you could offer suggestions to them about how they could improve their own post. | |
| Mar 23, 2021 at 13:28 | comment | added | Ainsley H. | One of the reasons I find it hard to do reviewing is that I don't exactly know what I should edit and not. Should we fix grammar? Should we make formulas into LaTeX? Should we rephrase questions to make them easier to understand? Where do we stop? | |
| Mar 23, 2021 at 13:24 | comment | added | Ainsley H. | I think publicizing the issue on meta is a good first step! | |
| Mar 23, 2021 at 9:24 | history | asked | Yuval Filmus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |