Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Where did you read that binomial heaps have $O(1)$ amortized time for insertion? I wonder if there's some context that is missing. Wikipedia's claim about amortized complexity only relates to consecutive insertions: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_heap#Insert, so it doesn't apply to alternating insertions and pops. Can you credit the source where you read that and give full context on what that resource claims? $\endgroup$ Commented May 12, 2021 at 1:46
  • $\begingroup$ I'm going based on what I was taught when I took the course in data structures, but of course there is the possibility that I misunderstood that part of the material. If I've understood you correctly, it's possible that an operation can have one "amortized cost" when it's part of a specific series, but in a complete analysis of the data structure its actual amortized cost is different. If this is what you mean, it helps to clarify things a great deal. $\endgroup$ Commented May 12, 2021 at 2:40