Timeline for Understanding reductions: Would a polynomial time algorithm for one NP-complete problem mean a polynomial time algorithm for all NP-complete problems?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2014 at 18:01 | comment | added | Mark Dominus | In Proof that SAT is NPC I explained in detail why a polynomial-time solution to SAT would provide a polynomial-time solution for any other problem in NP, such as 3-coloring. | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 11:14 | vote | accept | Mill | ||
| Dec 12, 2014 at 11:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCompSci/status/543362854783844352 | ||
| Dec 12, 2014 at 10:48 | history | edited | Mill | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 10:48 | answer | added | David Richerby | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 10:46 | answer | added | Tom van der Zanden | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 10:11 | history | edited | Mill | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 354 characters in body |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 10:04 | history | edited | David Richerby | edited tags | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:54 | answer | added | JiK | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:51 | history | edited | Mill | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 2 characters in body |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:48 | |||||
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:34 | history | asked | Mill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |