Post's problem, posed in 1944 by Post, was to know if there is a recursively enumerable set, which, being undecidable, was not equivalent to the Halting problem under Turing reducibility. While I've seen the proof that such sets exist (the book Gems of Theoretical Computer Science has a chapter on this), the proof works by (a bit artificially) constructing Turing incomparable sets. So far, I haven't seen an example of a concrete "natural" example of an undecidable set below the Halting problem, which I would like to find.
Here are some notes on Post's problem, with a proof idea of its solution.
My first attempt at coming up with such a set would be to consider somethin like A = {BB(n) : n $\in$ Halt}, because, even if I am supplied with A as an oracle, I can't seem to use it to know if n is in Halt without computing BB(n), which is an uncomputable function (the busy beaver function), but I'm a bit stuck trying to just prove that it is undecidable.
So my question is: do you know examples of concrete undecidable sets, with a lower degree of unsolvability than the Hating problem?
Thanks in advance