In general, I'd let a moderator speak for themselves - and Stephen Rauch is welcome to add an answer, too - but I happened to come across this and I think that you're a bit confused about how this site works and what is expected in an answer.
The explanation of deletion was right there in a comment (visible in your screenshot):
link-only answers are discouraged. please provide a self-contained answer.
A link-only answer is one that relies solely on links for the content. All answers on this platform should be self-contained. This means they should not require that viewers visit outside links or content to get the answer to the question. This is explained on the "How to Answer" help center article:
Links to external resources are encouraged, but please add context around the link so your fellow users will have some idea what it is and why it’s there. Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the external resource is unreachable or goes permanently offline.
Your answer does not explain the content of the links in a way that's sufficient that a viewer can avoid visiting them. You didn't quote the content of the article that relates to the question and put it in the context of the question.
Additionally, answers should be truly answers - a link to an article with a "This may have something to do with your question, so go read it" sort of comment isn't useful here. And your link to a product with the comment "unsure if it works" indicates that you haven't actually vetted the solution you're providing - which makes it not an answer.
This platform is not a message board where you can just drop a bunch of links and not expect them to be vetted or judged. Your answer was incomplete and relied too heavily on off-site content that could be removed rendering the answer useless and unsupported claims about a solution that may not even work.
The deletion of your answer, in this case, was correct.