Skip to main content
Data Science

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you. It seems distribution of data is so important and it isn't surprising of course. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11, 2019 at 14:49
  • $\begingroup$ But you still need to be realistic. It is unlikely you can decrease the number of False Negatives without increasing the number of False Positives. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11, 2019 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ You provide no data and no argument to back up your claim. I provide an example showing exactly why the OP's statement is correct. And I'm the one that needs to be realistic. Really? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11, 2019 at 23:50