Timeline for Does it make sense to randomly select features as a baseline?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2019 at 19:51 | vote | accept | Sterls | ||
| May 13, 2019 at 14:44 | answer | added | Juan Esteban de la Calle | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 13, 2019 at 14:40 | answer | added | Brian Spiering | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 13, 2019 at 14:37 | history | edited | Brian Spiering | CC BY-SA 4.0 | edited title |
| May 13, 2019 at 14:23 | history | edited | Juan Esteban de la Calle | CC BY-SA 4.0 | style corrections |
| May 13, 2019 at 13:36 | comment | added | Andy M | Seems reasonable to me. Maybe showing all features, randomly selected, and then your method would be a fair comparison. If feature selection is relevant to the paper, why not show a benchmark? | |
| May 13, 2019 at 13:27 | history | asked | Sterls | CC BY-SA 4.0 |