Timeline for Is SQL Server's FILETABLE suitable for storing large files (bigger than 10 GB)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2013 at 7:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDBAs/status/401968403453603840 | ||
| Oct 29, 2013 at 4:35 | vote | accept | huoxudong125 | ||
| Oct 29, 2013 at 1:53 | comment | added | huoxudong125 | @Max Vernon One requirement detail:we have a machine(Xradia MicroXCT) to scan the sample(such as small rocks),in the processing we will input some parameters for the MicroXCT's control system.Because of the parameters are important for MicroXCT's result,so we must save the parameters and the MicroXCT's result(raw data) which size is bigger than 10 GB._The raw data will be processed in next days or months or years,so we must keep the raw data and the parameters for long time._ | |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 18:04 | history | edited | Hannah Vernon♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | improved formatting |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 17:52 | answer | added | Hannah Vernon♦ | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 12:35 | comment | added | Remus Rusanu | Any requirement from the file storage? HA/DR? Failover, Mirroring? Backup/Restore? ACID Xact? Why did you consider FT to start with? | |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 12:24 | answer | added | Twinkles | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 9:23 | history | edited | huoxudong125 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited title |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 8:05 | answer | added | TomTom | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 28, 2013 at 7:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 28, 2013 at 10:47 | |||||
| Oct 28, 2013 at 7:19 | history | asked | huoxudong125 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |