Timeline for Key attributes of Continuous Integration (CI) software
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021 at 18:56 | history | rollback | 030 | Rollback to Revision 4 | |
| May 12, 2021 at 18:03 | comment | added | Tatranskymedved | @030 Sorry but I have to pretty much disagree with last edit related to "title change". Original question was related to "key attributes" and now it points to "which CI to use" ~ which software to recommend. As I see it, that part of edit is non-productive and against original question. | |
| Dec 27, 2019 at 8:58 | history | reopened | 030 | ||
| Dec 27, 2019 at 8:57 | history | edited | 030 | CC BY-SA 4.0 | edited tags; edited title |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 12:24 | comment | added | Ashish Karpe | good link for jenkins Vs teamcity this will help to descide which CI tool to go for linkedin.com/pulse/jenkins-vs-teamcity-amir-najjar | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 9:44 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 14:00 | |||||
| S Mar 7, 2017 at 9:25 | history | edited | Pierre.Vriens♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Fix grammar |
| S Mar 7, 2017 at 9:25 | history | suggested | 7ochem | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Removed "Thanks" |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 8:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 7, 2017 at 9:25 | |||||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 7:24 | comment | added | Tatranskymedved | @JiriKlouda Ok, this is valid argument, I agree on that. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 7:18 | history | closed | Jiri Klouda Danny Nimmo CommunityBot Evgeny Zislis Dawny33 | Opinion-based | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 6:20 | comment | added | Jiri Klouda | The problem with the question asking for key attributes in Continuous Integration software is that you will get the same answer as with selecting almost any others tool. For example avi's answer could be just as well applied to code review tool or version control system or wiki or pretty much anything. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 6:15 | comment | added | Jiri Klouda | There is not going to be a clear winner. Some of the 10+ products might start falling by the wayside as the requirements increase, but at the start without any specifics it is hard to say. Most people will never get to a point where the lack of features would even show as significant. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 6:08 | comment | added | Tatranskymedved | @JiriKlouda Thank You for follow up! I had in mind while creating to make this not too broad nor opinion based. The difference: All systems considered as CI are doing same work which will most likely not change over time. If You put them on scale, will there always be one winner ? As not, what is making them "special"? This abstract definitions on key points should be always the same and thus not broad/changing. If question would be put in a way "what is better system", "which CI systems do You know" or "what are diff between this and that", that would fit for the flag. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 5:20 | comment | added | Jiri Klouda | With the edit, I am going to for now close this as duplicate of this question: stackoverflow.com/questions/1438390/comparison-of-ci-servers | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 5:18 | comment | added | Jiri Klouda | Look, your question is very broad because you have not tried these tools. You can easily install them in a container with few commands and try them out. If you have almost no experience, you can pretty much pick at random, get experience with one tool and then if it stops working for you, you can come and ask more specific question on what features you need and which tools might have those or which plugin you need for your current tool to get that feature. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 3:01 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 7:18 | |||||
| Mar 2, 2017 at 7:31 | vote | accept | Tatranskymedved | ||
| Mar 1, 2017 at 11:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 1, 2017 at 12:08 | |||||
| Mar 1, 2017 at 8:33 | answer | added | Dan Cornilescu | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 8:00 | answer | added | avi | timeline score: 13 | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 7:06 | comment | added | Tatranskymedved | @Alexandre Thanks for follow up, I have edited the answer: honestly I don't want to know the difference between each system (or just systems above), I'm looking for an information about what functions are possible and which (from the experience of users) are the most beneficial. | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 7:04 | history | edited | Tatranskymedved | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 619 characters in body |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 6:49 | comment | added | Alexandre | It would help if you can elaborate on what you are looking for in your CI tool. What are your requirements, what are your need? For instance: what languages will you be building artifacts from? Are you interested in a SaaS model or do you prefer hosting your own CI? There are other CI tools out there, why did you nail it down to these three? Giving us more information will allow answers more tailored to your need, otherwise, you'll get generic answers that you can already Google: hackernoon.com/… | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 6:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 | |||||
| Mar 1, 2017 at 6:40 | history | asked | Tatranskymedved | CC BY-SA 3.0 |