Timeline for Rules flag on flagging flag
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 9:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 14:47 | comment | added | fruitsalad | @Pierre.Vriens Thank you for your help! Rules link solved my problem! | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 14:46 | vote | accept | fruitsalad | ||
| Sep 13, 2016 at 14:30 | comment | added | Pierre.Vriens | @fruitsalad : correct me if I'm wrong, but nowhere in your question there is the word node. So therefor I think your latest 2 comments (or at least the last one) is a different question. To not invalidate my (long) answer from long time ago, how about an approach like so: (a) consider my answer as "good enough" (or "as good as it gets"), and mark it as accepted (even though it may not have completely answered your question, did it really not help at all? (b) post a new question (cfr your last 2 comments), if needed with a link to this question here (as a followup question or so?). | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 14:21 | comment | added | fruitsalad | @Pierre.Vriens My problem is, that I do not know how to tell Drupal, Rules on what Node it should work. !Screenshot. On the screenshot you see View 3. When I flag the flag A of a User with "Accept" I send a mail to him to tell him that he has been chosen for a friendly. All the other users in the list should get a mail telling them "sorry you've not been accpeted, better luck next time" | |
| Sep 12, 2016 at 11:32 | comment | added | fruitsalad | @Pierre.Vriens : No. It does not work the way I want it to. I found a secondary solution by setting hidden fields in flag B with the values of flag A that i needed. But this solution works but is not very nice and clean. Next problem I got now is that I want to send emails to all flagging-users of flag A, that have not been flagged with flag B. This rule event when another users flag A has been flagged with flag B. This should work as cancellation message. | |
| Sep 6, 2016 at 13:27 | comment | added | Pierre.Vriens | @fruitsalad : did you ever get this to work? | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:34 | comment | added | Pierre.Vriens | Interesting! I do the same after a few weeks or so. The challenge with that is to "remember which answers to do that for" ... Would be nice if drupal.SE would have a flagging-feature like "wait for feedback" ... one could use "bookmarks" (but that is not what that should be used for I feel). But guess what ... I plan working on something like that soon (also) ... it'll be Drupal based .... | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | Adrian Cid Almaguer | @Pierre.Vriens usually I visite the profile of new members and if I see that the don't have read the TOUR and they don't have accepted answer I post a comment like this | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:21 | comment | added | Pierre.Vriens | hey @AdrianCidAlmaguer ... thank you for the apparent "support". I assume that at least you are already convinced that Rules_Link is going to be "the" answer to this (challenging) flagging-the-flag puzzle. FYI: I'm pretty sure too (now ...). However I've learned to give people (lots of) time to digest answers. Even if they forget to some day come back to confirm it did work (with an accept, etc as you suggested). What I like way more is that such a difficult to understand question is close to an answer (it would have been so much easier to just vote-to-close, which I rarely do). | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:12 | comment | added | Adrian Cid Almaguer | @fruitsalad is this answer solved your question remember check it as accepted, of you don't know how read this drupal.stackexchange.com/tour | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:01 | comment | added | Pierre.Vriens | I think we're close to "the" solution for your flagging-the-flag-with-flags-that-can-be-flagged puzzle ... head over to the edit (2) part of my answer I just added ... (and let me know how it turns out) ... PS: say hello to the "mannshaft" (or something like that) ... | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 14:58 | history | edited | Pierre.Vriens | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1919 characters in body |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 14:04 | comment | added | fruitsalad | Thank you so much! I added an explanation of the rule and the whole idea behind it. | |
| Dec 1, 2015 at 19:30 | history | edited | Pierre.Vriens | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1137 characters in body |
| Dec 1, 2015 at 18:49 | comment | added | Pierre.Vriens | Aha, "now" we are cooking ... it should help to start digesting your question. Give me some time to do so. I "think" that 'flagged-flagging' is what you call "flag A", correct? But by just looking at the exported rule, I'm not sure how to understand/read your rules condition with that 'flag_flagged_freundschaftsspiel_bestaetigen'. Is it something like "if flagged with flag B"? Also, what's the difference between 'flagged-flagging-user' and 'flagging-user' (in your rules condition)? FYI: it may help if you explain these field names used in your rule (via edit of your question). | |
| Dec 1, 2015 at 18:23 | comment | added | fruitsalad | Hello. I added an export of my rule to my question. Thank you very much! | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 23:36 | comment | added | fruitsalad | Thank you very much for your help. I get all tokens from flag A. But no comparable token as flagging-user:mail. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 19:43 | history | answered | Pierre.Vriens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |