Skip to main content
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
hotpaw2
  • 36k
  • 10
  • 49
  • 94

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only near the toptops (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only near the top (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only near the tops (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
hotpaw2
  • 36k
  • 10
  • 49
  • 94

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only near the top halves (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only top halves (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only near the top (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

added 6 characters in body
Source Link
hotpaw2
  • 36k
  • 10
  • 49
  • 94

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only topstop halves (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only tops (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

If you sample a signal at too low a sampling rate, you won't necessarily get alternating samples. You could end up sampling only top halves (for awhile), or only bottoms, or only zero crossings, etc., which would look like samples of a "smooth" waveform of a much lower frequency than at some fixed value such as half the sampling frequency.

Source Link
hotpaw2
  • 36k
  • 10
  • 49
  • 94
Loading