Timeline for How do you find the frequency and amplitude from a DFT?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2015 at 13:32 | comment | added | Peter K.♦ | OK, I can confirm your results. That must be why the other interpolation methods don't use parabolic interpolation! :-) | |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 13:10 | comment | added | Hugh | @PeterK. I have just put a quadratic through three points. Is it more subtle? If you look you can see it goes through the points. | |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 11:31 | comment | added | Peter K.♦ | That's very odd. The parabolic interpolations are among the fastest and most accurate. Have you tried using some of the code on Eric's website? I suspect there is something wrong with your implementation or something amiss with your data. | |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 10:09 | history | edited | Hugh | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Extended information in question also looking at suggestions of answers |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 9:29 | history | edited | jojeck♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 2 characters in body |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 3:52 | answer | added | Lukas | timeline score: -1 | |
| Sep 23, 2015 at 20:40 | answer | added | hotpaw2 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 23, 2015 at 17:12 | answer | added | Peter K.♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 23, 2015 at 17:00 | history | asked | Hugh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |