Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • $\begingroup$ That makes sense. Is it more typical to filter at 0.5Hz or 1Hz to remove DC? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 26, 2017 at 6:19
  • $\begingroup$ The lower frequency bound will be entirely dependent on the system in question. The closer the cutoff is to the signal of interest, the sharper the cutoff needs to be. (IE, harder to implement) However the farther the cutoff is from the frequency of interest, the longer it takes to remove the undesired signal. These are the design trade offs that makes this vocation so interesting. There is no right answer. However, over time a particular field will often settle on a standard cutoff, because it has been proven to work in that specific problem domain. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 26, 2017 at 6:27