Skip to main content
Notice removed Canonical answer required by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with Royi's answer chosen by CommunityBot
deleted 16 characters in body
Source Link
2080
  • 69
  • 5

Measure Measures of Similarity between Images"coincidence"?

Assuming I have two camera or other sensor feeds, is there an algorithm that gives an estimate of how likely it is that they point at/derive data from the same scene (possibly from different angles, with different modalities, filters and perspectives)?

Perhaps a measure of how easily the data streams could be related/reduced to a common cause?

Simple correlation does not seem to suffice here, since the signals may only be indirectly (and nonlinearly) related and do not necessarily have the same "shape".

This seems to be related, but not the same as the image registration problem.

Measure of Similarity between Images

Assuming I have two camera or other sensor feeds, is there an algorithm that gives an estimate of how likely it is that they point at/derive data from the same scene (possibly from different angles, with different modalities, filters and perspectives)?

Perhaps a measure of how easily the data streams could be related/reduced to a common cause?

Simple correlation does not seem to suffice here, since the signals may only be indirectly (and nonlinearly) related and do not necessarily have the same "shape".

This seems to be related, but not the same as the image registration problem.

Measures of "coincidence"?

Assuming I have two sensor feeds, is there an algorithm that gives an estimate of how likely it is that they point at/derive data from the same scene (possibly from different angles, with different modalities, filters and perspectives)?

Perhaps a measure of how easily the data streams could be related/reduced to a common cause?

Simple correlation does not seem to suffice here, since the signals may only be indirectly (and nonlinearly) related and do not necessarily have the same "shape".

This seems to be related, but not the same as the image registration problem.

edited tags; edited title
Link
Royi
  • 21k
  • 4
  • 200
  • 242
Notice added Canonical answer required by 2080
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by 2080
added 81 characters in body
Source Link
2080
  • 69
  • 5

Assuming I have two camera or other sensor feeds, is there an algorithm that gives an estimate onof how likely it is that these camerasthey point at/derive data from the same scene (possibly from different angles, with different sensorsmodalities, filters and lighting conditionsperspectives)?

Perhaps a measure of how easily the data streams could be related/reduced to a common cause?

Simple correlation does not seem to be sufficientsuffice here, since the signals may only be indirectly (and nonlinearly) related and do not necessarily have the same "shape".

This seems to be related, but not the same as the image registration problem.

Assuming I have two camera or other sensor feeds, is there an algorithm that gives an estimate on how likely it is that these cameras point at the same scene (possibly from different angles, with different sensors, filters and lighting conditions)?

Simple correlation does not seem to be sufficient here, since the signals may only be indirectly (and nonlinearly) related and do not necessarily have the same "shape".

This seems to be related, but not the same as the image registration problem.

Assuming I have two camera or other sensor feeds, is there an algorithm that gives an estimate of how likely it is that they point at/derive data from the same scene (possibly from different angles, with different modalities, filters and perspectives)?

Perhaps a measure of how easily the data streams could be related/reduced to a common cause?

Simple correlation does not seem to suffice here, since the signals may only be indirectly (and nonlinearly) related and do not necessarily have the same "shape".

This seems to be related, but not the same as the image registration problem.

Source Link
2080
  • 69
  • 5
Loading