Timeline for 100BASE-T two devices on a single ethernet port
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 22, 2020 at 11:53 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 | broken image fixed (click 'rendered output' or 'side-by-side' to see the difference); for more info, see https://gist.github.com/Glorfindel83/9d954d34385d2ac2597bbe864466259f |
| Nov 22, 2020 at 8:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 22, 2020 at 11:53 | |||||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 23:48 | comment | added | opsec | I am not sure what chunky black gull wing packages are... But I think you are correct about having to use two magentics. | |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 23:45 | vote | accept | opsec | ||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 23:21 | history | edited | opsec | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 176 characters in body |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 22:25 | comment | added | ThreePhaseEel | Why the heck can't you just slap two standard 100BaseT magnetics (the ones in chunky black gull wing packages) back-to-back for this? | |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 21:34 | answer | added | zeqL | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 21:19 | answer | added | Janka | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 21:14 | history | edited | brhans | CC BY-SA 3.0 | reformatted scrolling code block into bullet points for easier readbility |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 21:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 21:42 | |||||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 21:03 | history | asked | opsec | CC BY-SA 3.0 |