Timeline for Am I over-complicating this data acquisition design?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2017 at 12:47 | comment | added | Dave Tweed | A digital filter after the ADC can't do anything to prevent aliasing, which is presumably why the OP was considering analog filters in the first place. And if aliasing is not a concern, then there's no point to having an analog filter at all. So my comment regarding your thoughts on the analog filter are still completely appropriate. | |
| Feb 13, 2017 at 5:11 | comment | added | user1139880 | Your comment was about a filter between the mux and the adc. My reply here is about having a filter after the adc. That is, sample fast and implement the filter in software, one per channel. | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 17:08 | comment | added | Dave Tweed | See my comment to TonyM | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 17:04 | history | answered | user1139880 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |