Timeline for Isolating only RS485 digital signals but not power
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30 at 11:26 | history | edited | Andy aka | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 170 characters in body |
| Jul 29 at 19:23 | comment | added | Andy aka | @Justme thanks. | |
| Jul 29 at 17:27 | history | edited | Andy aka | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 336 characters in body |
| Jul 29 at 17:19 | comment | added | Andy aka | @Marcos since you have added the schematic it's clear that your circuit is not being used in an isolated way. The only redeeming provision is that it's battery powered. | |
| Jul 29 at 15:26 | comment | added | Marcos | @Justme the ADM2587 GND2 is tied on the board to GND1. I will update the block diagram and show a proper schema. | |
| Jul 29 at 14:06 | comment | added | Andy aka | Did you remove the dv @Justme || I mean, I didn't see you apply it to the other answer. | |
| Jul 29 at 14:05 | comment | added | Justme | Let's hope it is, it would be at least a solution for a lack of a better one. | |
| Jul 29 at 13:59 | comment | added | Andy aka | @Justme maybe the dotted line is a shield connected to the signal reference on the ADM2587? | |
| Jul 29 at 13:49 | comment | added | Justme | I guess more like answering before verifying if the provided info is correct, but you are correct by providing a generic answer for a generic question even if the actual design may still have a horrible error lurking in there. Will remove the downvote. | |
| Jul 29 at 13:43 | comment | added | Andy aka | I'd hardly call the image in the question a design; it's more of a block diagram so, when you downvoted my answer presumably you meant to downvote the question @Justme | |
| Jul 29 at 13:37 | comment | added | Justme | Yeah but if there is isolation then it's missing a common reference, so it's a design error. | |
| Jul 29 at 13:31 | history | answered | Andy aka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |