Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Circuit fantasist
  • 21.3k
  • 2
  • 24
  • 79
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackElectronix/status/379806001228431360
small typo fix
Source Link
Derek W
  • 151
  • 1
  • 5

So I was going through some problems for a classcourse that I haveam taking this semester and I came upon a problem that seemed to imply something. Let me first say that I am not looking for the solution to this problem, but rather it spawned a question that has me in the need for some clarification.

The questionproblem was to write a two-level logic version of the following equation using AND, OR, and NOT gates only.

F = A + (B*\$\bar C\$)

As far as I can tell - that's not possible unless the NOT gate does not count towards the depth. So this raised the question - does a NOT gate not count towardtowards the depth of a circuit?

The definition I typically see is that the depth of a Boolean circuit is the largest number of gates between a given input and output. The textbook for my course also uses this definition. So is this the impossible task? Or am I just not thinking cleverly enough?

Thanks for any insight!

So I was going through some problems for a class I have this semester. Let me first say that I am not looking for the solution to this problem, but rather it spawned a question that has me in the need for some clarification.

The question was to write a two-level logic version of the following equation using AND, OR, and NOT gates only.

F = A + (B*\$\bar C\$)

As far as I can tell - that's not possible unless the NOT gate does not count towards the depth. So this raised the question - does a NOT gate not count toward the depth of a circuit?

The definition I typically see is that the depth of a Boolean circuit is the largest number of gates between a given input and output. The textbook for my course also uses this definition. So is this the impossible task? Or am I just not thinking cleverly enough?

Thanks for any insight!

So I was going through some problems for a course that I am taking this semester and I came upon a problem that seemed to imply something. Let me first say that I am not looking for the solution to this problem, but rather it spawned a question that has me in the need for some clarification.

The problem was to write a two-level logic version of the following equation using AND, OR, and NOT gates only.

F = A + (B*\$\bar C\$)

As far as I can tell - that's not possible unless the NOT gate does not count towards the depth. So this raised the question - does a NOT gate not count towards the depth of a circuit?

The definition I typically see is that the depth of a Boolean circuit is the largest number of gates between a given input and output. The textbook for my course also uses this definition. So is this the impossible task? Or am I just not thinking cleverly enough?

Thanks for any insight!

Source Link
Derek W
  • 151
  • 1
  • 5

Does the NOT gate count towards the depth of a circuit?

So I was going through some problems for a class I have this semester. Let me first say that I am not looking for the solution to this problem, but rather it spawned a question that has me in the need for some clarification.

The question was to write a two-level logic version of the following equation using AND, OR, and NOT gates only.

F = A + (B*\$\bar C\$)

As far as I can tell - that's not possible unless the NOT gate does not count towards the depth. So this raised the question - does a NOT gate not count toward the depth of a circuit?

The definition I typically see is that the depth of a Boolean circuit is the largest number of gates between a given input and output. The textbook for my course also uses this definition. So is this the impossible task? Or am I just not thinking cleverly enough?

Thanks for any insight!