Timeline for Control RGB LED without microcontroller
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2014 at 16:25 | comment | added | mikeY | @alexan_e My fault - bad wording on my end. Not upset. Merely suggesting that if you have another way, you could provide it to OP. It's all good. I appreciate your comment. | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 16:21 | comment | added | alexan_e | I'm not sure why you get upset, I just made a suggestion to reduce the component count. When there is a resistor connected to the emitter there is no need for a base resistor, if you like to use it anyway then do so. | |
| Jan 28, 2014 at 16:03 | comment | added | mikeY | @alexan_e When you answer the question, you should certainly do those things. | |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 23:03 | comment | added | alexan_e | R5 is not needed. You can also invert Q2 with the led cathode on the emitter, collector to GND and then you can remove R4 too. | |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 17:28 | history | edited | Phil Frost | CC BY-SA 3.0 | We can see that the question was edited by the information at the bottom. No need to say you've edited it two more times in the body (that's three times it says it's been edited) |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 15:55 | history | edited | mikeY | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 15:50 | comment | added | mikeY | Sorry. Sort of assumed that. You are correct. | |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 15:48 | comment | added | RedGrittyBrick | It would be normal to have current-limiting resistors for LEDs and for BJT bases. | |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 15:47 | history | answered | mikeY | CC BY-SA 3.0 |