Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    Hi Zaile, thank you for taking the time to post a screenshot and suggestions for ubiquitous mode, etc. I've been trying out normal ido before I explore the jumps to icicles, ido ubiquitous, etc. Your screenshot is exactly what I want to see (and expect to see) in the minibuffer. But even using ido-dired, it behaves as I described above. One tab/space shows me a dot in a normal buffer, a second space/tab shows a full list, typing a char and backspacing shows the nice minibuffer list. And I don't want dired, since I'm calling (ido-read-directory-name ...) from code.. Weird behavior. Commented May 2, 2016 at 3:27
  • (two part comment, part 1) I cannot personally speak for the niche functions of ido-mode because from the get go, I set up my installation with ido-ubiquitous. Similarly, I have never used icicles because ubiquitous has worked really well for me. I understand if you want to work you way up, but, that said, I am ~nearly~ promising you instant results with the set up I use with the catch that there is not something else conflicting in your init file. Opinion aside, ido-mode, according to the GNU manual, was meant for "switch[ing] between buffers and visit files and directories..." Commented May 2, 2016 at 3:44
  • (part two) and what you seem to want is a very specific behavior out of ido. You may very well be able to get it to behave as you want without any additional packages, but searching directories alone was a function dired-mode was kind of build with in mind. That's why C-x d command works as well as it does: that's the behavior it was designed to have. Ultimately, while I can't help you further along what you want to do (and I respect your approach/desired execution), may I suggest you try a temp init file with the configuration I suggested? That way you at least get to try it & see. Commented May 2, 2016 at 3:49
  • Also, I'm glad to have given what advice I had to offer, no problem. I like to help as much as I can. I am pretty new to emacs and I understand how difficult it can be to figure out. That's a characteristic that seems to apply regardless to how experienced some users are and (as I've sort of mentioned), I think it ultimately comes down to the fact emacs has so many modes with so many sub-functions that are easy to forget, conflict, or just misuse. Commented May 2, 2016 at 3:51