Timeline for Returning org-babel results from an asynchronous call
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2015 at 18:10 | vote | accept | stsquad | ||
| Nov 17, 2014 at 10:14 | vote | accept | stsquad | ||
| Nov 17, 2014 at 10:14 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2014 at 16:01 | comment | added | mankoff | I think that is a great example. | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 15:18 | answer | added | stsquad | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 14:34 | comment | added | stsquad | @mankoff: How's the new elisp only example? | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 14:33 | history | edited | stsquad | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Removed problem context, went for simple example |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 14:22 | comment | added | stsquad | @mankoff: well bash is inherently synchronous isn't it? I did wrap all the build and upload stuff into one script to simplify it but the LAVA job submission is something that happens asynchronously within emacs. | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 13:52 | comment | added | mankoff | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_Working_Example why not have a 3-line bash script that returns something asynch that anyone can run/test/understand? | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 9:05 | comment | added | stsquad | @mankoff: OK I've re-worded and simplified the question to try an make it easier to follow. Is that better? | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 9:05 | history | edited | stsquad | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Simplified the org snippet, re-worded the question, removed extraneous questions |
| Oct 21, 2014 at 19:39 | comment | added | mankoff | Apart from the title, it isn't actually clear what your question is. Answering the title, I think this question comes up often on the Org email list, and the answer is "not currently supported". | |
| Oct 21, 2014 at 16:21 | history | asked | stsquad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |