Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Stack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternalDoes magit have a feature to overcome this?
Magit doesn't have a feature along the lines of what you describe.
I'd recommend that you not store the private and public commits on the same branch. Switch to the public branch to make public commits, then sync those changesthat branch with another branch that has the private branchcommits. Depending on your tastes, you could do that beby either (1) rebasing the private branch on top of the public or (2) merging the public into the private branch.
Does magit have a feature to overcome this?
Magit doesn't have a feature along the lines of what you describe.
I'd recommend that you not store the private and public commits on the same branch. Switch to the public branch to make public commits, then sync those changes with the private branch. Depending on your tastes, you could do that be either (1) rebasing the private branch on top of the public or (2) merging the public into the private branch.
Does magit have a feature to overcome this?
Magit doesn't have a feature along the lines of what you describe.
I'd recommend that you not store the private and public commits on the same branch. Switch to the public branch to make public commits, then sync that branch with another branch that has the private commits. Depending on your tastes, you could do that by either (1) rebasing the private branch on top of the public or (2) merging the public into the private branch.
Does magit have a feature to overcome this?
Magit doesn't have a feature along the lines of what you describe.
I'd recommend that you not store the private and public commits on the same branch. Switch to the public branch to make public commits, then sync those changes with the private branch. Depending on your tastes, you could do that be either (1) rebasing the private branch on top of the public or (2) merging the public into the private branch.
