Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    Try emacs -Q, cut and paste the forms you added to your init file (modified as per the answer below) into the *scratch* buffer and evaluate each one by putting the cursor after its closing parenthesis and typing C-j. You might try a more obvious color than "blue" (I suggest "red") for checking. If that works, cut and paste the working forms into your init file and try restarting emacs (without the -Q this time). If that does not work, then figure out why your init file is not being read. See gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Windows-HOME.html for hints. Commented Feb 4 at 15:20
  • Thanks for this suggestion. I tried this and evaluating (setq-default cursor-type 'box) returns box and doesn't change anything. Evaluating (set-cursor-color "blue") returns nil and doesn't change anything. Commented Feb 10 at 13:25
  • Did you start with emacs -Q? If not, please do so: it might be that something in your init is causing your emacs to behave differently from everybody else's, but both the above and the blink-cursor-mode setting behave differently in my case (and I presume in @amitp's case) than in yours, so my inclination is to blame your init file (or if you get the same behavior with -Q, your emacs build - where did you get your emacs and what is its version? Do M-x emacs-version to find out the version). Commented Feb 10 at 16:21
  • Unless there is some new information, your new question sounds to me similar (if not identical) to this one. Let's continue with this question until it is resolved, rather than working on two different questions. Commented Feb 10 at 16:38
  • I created a chat room for further discussion. Commented Feb 12 at 14:21