Return to Answer

deleted 11 characters in body

edited Oct 2, 2021 at 12:45

19.6k
6
81
158

There's an infinite number of ways in which an ERC-20/ BEP-20 contract can be implemented.

In your case, the token contract has two modifiers set on the transfer function:

function transfer(address to, uint256 value) external override validRecipient(to) initialDistributionLock returns (bool) { _transferFrom(msg.sender, to, value); return true; }

Your contract call passes the first modifier validRecipient because that checks only whether the recipient is not the zero address. But the second modifier initialDistributionLock ...

modifier initialDistributionLock() { require( initialDistributionFinished || isOwner() || allowTransfer[msg.sender] ); _; }

initialDistributionFinished is a storage boolean that is currently set to false. And since 0x82a55de9d15b13eb6db1b6526d9e6e2e25397903 is neither the owner of the contract nor it has enabled transfers by being set in the allowTransfer mapping, the contract call is reverted.

Therefore, transfers are disabled during the "initial distribution" phase. If you have access to the owner account, you should be able to set this flag to true and be able to make your transfer.

There's an infinite number of ways in which an ERC-20/ BEP-20 contract can be implemented.

In your case, the token contract has two modifiers set on the transfer function:

function transfer(address to, uint256 value) external override validRecipient(to) initialDistributionLock returns (bool) { _transferFrom(msg.sender, to, value); return true; }

Your contract call passes the first modifier validRecipient because that checks only whether the recipient is not the zero address. But the second modifier initialDistributionLock ...

modifier initialDistributionLock() { require( initialDistributionFinished || isOwner() || allowTransfer[msg.sender] ); _; }

Therefore, transfers are disabled during the "initial distribution" phase. If you have access to the owner account, you should be able to set this flag to true and be able to make your transfer.

There's an infinite number of ways in which an ERC-20/ BEP-20 contract can be implemented.

In your case, the token contract has two modifiers set on the transfer function:

function transfer(address to, uint256 value) external override validRecipient(to) initialDistributionLock returns (bool) { _transferFrom(msg.sender, to, value); return true; }

Your contract call passes the first modifier validRecipient because that checks only whether the recipient is not the zero address. But the second modifier initialDistributionLock ...

modifier initialDistributionLock() { require( initialDistributionFinished || isOwner() || allowTransfer[msg.sender] ); _; }

Therefore, transfers are disabled during the "initial distribution" phase. If you have access to the owner account, you should be able to set this flag to true and make your transfer.

Source Link

answered Oct 2, 2021 at 12:39

Paul Razvan Berg

19.6k
6
81
158

There's an infinite number of ways in which an ERC-20/ BEP-20 contract can be implemented.

In your case, the token contract has two modifiers set on the transfer function:

function transfer(address to, uint256 value) external override validRecipient(to) initialDistributionLock returns (bool) { _transferFrom(msg.sender, to, value); return true; }

Your contract call passes the first modifier validRecipient because that checks only whether the recipient is not the zero address. But the second modifier initialDistributionLock ...

modifier initialDistributionLock() { require( initialDistributionFinished || isOwner() || allowTransfer[msg.sender] ); _; }

Therefore, transfers are disabled during the "initial distribution" phase. If you have access to the owner account, you should be able to set this flag to true and be able to make your transfer.