Edit - Ethereum Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Thx a lot, donnoh. Not being able to trustlessly proof that a certain transaction has been settled on L1 seems to be really a bad design. Maybe the following is a solution applied by zk rollups which publish state diffs: In addition to the state diff, they could publish to L1 a Merkle proof for each and every transaction included in the batch. Maybe this needs much less data compared to puclishing the full transactions because hashed in Merkle proofs are very small? Any idea whether this makes sense / is applied?

Felix
– Felix

2024-01-31 13:44:58 +00:00
Commented Jan 31, 2024 at 13:44

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »