Timeline for Is it possible to deploy a contract from browser-solidity for the Mainnet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 | comment | added | Olivier Rikken | @NineCattoRules but you can upvote ;-) | |
| Sep 14, 2017 at 8:20 | comment | added | NineCattoRules | "I don't know anyone who did it that way" ...same here, I was just curious about it. (by the way I didn't downvote ;) ) | |
| Sep 14, 2017 at 8:14 | comment | added | Olivier Rikken | @NineCattoRules I don't know anyone who did it that way, but you could try with an extremely simple contract with no further functions in it and see if the address is created correcty? (this to minimize the amount of gas you will lose). | |
| Sep 14, 2017 at 8:12 | comment | added | Olivier Rikken | @RichardHorrocks I was answering it indeed stating that to the best of my knowledge that it should be possible to use browser solidity and metamask to deploy a contract on the main net. | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 8:00 | comment | added | NineCattoRules | @lungj My question was made for asking to someone who already did in the real life, I know that probably it's possible but I would like (for my knowledge) to be 100% sure | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 3:59 | comment | added | lungj | @RichardHorrocks, I think OlivierRikken is saying that there shouldn't be any problems deploying a contract on the main net using browser-solidity and Metamask, which does in fact answer the question. (Perhaps you were replying to something that has since been deleted) | |
| Sep 12, 2017 at 19:36 | comment | added | Richard Horrocks | This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review | |
| Sep 12, 2017 at 18:37 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 13, 2017 at 3:58 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2017 at 18:18 | history | answered | Olivier Rikken | CC BY-SA 3.0 |