Something is wrong.
Local governments paying to deal with the climate crisis employ the very oil, gas, and coal lobbyists who are making the crisis worse.
A study by F Minus and Brown University’s Climate and Development lab exposes a culture of CO lobbying firms supporting climate legislation on behalf of local governments at the same time they are opposing the legislation for their fossil fuel clients.
The evaporation of the Great Salt Lake threatens to blanket nearby cities and towns with arsenic and other toxins, yet the government of Salt Lake City shares the firm Foxley & Pignanelli with four fossil fuel companies whose projects are accelerating global warming.
City and county governments in California face soaring costs for climate mitigation, yet many employ fossil fuel lobbyists, including the cities of Los Angeles, Santa Cruz, and Sacramento, and the counties of Alameda and San Mateo. Residents of these places overwhelmingly support a shift to renewable energy—so why are their governments hiring oil and gas lobbyists?
The climate crisis will cost Florida an estimated $76 billion by 2040, with much of the burden falling on local governments. Lobbyist registration data for 2023 reveals more than 200 local governments in Florida relying on fossil fuel lobbyists, including Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, Tampa Bay, and Jacksonville.
Something is wrong.
Colleges and universities—whose students are pushing for divestment from fossil fuels—continue to employ lobbyists who also work for ExxonMobil, the Koch Companies, and other funders of climate denialism.
In Maryland, an F Minus audit of disclosures by a firm that represents both Johns Hopkins University and the American Petroleum Institute found the firm making incomplete and inaccurate disclosures to the Maryland Ethics Commission that concealed two instances of the firm opposing a climate bill that JHU supported.
What do you get when you cross the Ivy League with Canadian tar sands oil? The answer, in New Hampshire, is the lobbying firm RYP Granite Strategies, which works for both Dartmouth College and Enbridge.
In 2024, Stanford University research about the health risks from gas stoves helped convince the California State Assembly to pass a bill requiring health warning labels on gas stoves. But lobbying against the bill on behalf of Southern California Gas was Stanford’s own lobbying firm, Cruz Strategies, as part of an effort that convinced Gov. Gavin Newsom to veto it.
In Missouri, agriculture is under threat from climate change, and flooding has caused more than $49 billion in economic damage since 1980. But the University of Missouri shares a lobbying firm with Koch Industries, which has funneled more than $145 million to groups that attack climate change science and policy interventions.
In 2023, UC Berkeley and UC San Francisco testified in support of SB 252, a bill to divest the $750 billion California state pension fund from fossil fuels. Opposing them and helping to defeat the bill was oil driller Berry through its lobbying firm Arc Strategies, which also represents the University of California’s Office of the President.
The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign’s climate action plan singles out the destructive impacts of coal, but the university shares a lobbying firm with Foresight Energy, the largest privately-owned coal company in the U.S., and the Prairie State Generating Company, owner of the second-largest coal mine in Illinois.
Is your lobbyist failing on climate?
Research by F Minus reveals more than 1,500 state-level lobbyists who are playing both sides of the climate crisis by working for the fossil fuel industry at the same time they are working for people, communities, schools, businesses, nonprofit organizations and others being harmed by the crisis.
F Minus is disrupting this dynamic. Use this database to discover the extent to which fossil fuel lobbyists are also representing victims of the climate crisis in your state.
© 2026 F Minus. All Rights Reserved.