Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author | user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score | score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers | answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections | title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status | closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types | is:question is:answer |
| Exclude | -[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with refactoring
Search options not deleted user 36207
2 votes
Would it be more efficient to handle 2D collision detection with polygons, rather than both ...
It's simple, the more vertices you have, the higher the performance cost. But, keep in mind you are doing 2D collisions so it's not as intensive as 3D. Doesn't mean things can't get complicated, but f …
- 208