Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • Thank you for your comments. However, it improves a lot. However, how could I have my rasters like superposed? Currently it improves a lot the reproduction but they are not displayed at the same location. And do you know how I could use projectRaster in a way r1 does not change its spatial resolution (keep it to 100, 100)? Thanks in advance! Commented May 12, 2019 at 21:57
  • You need to create a 100x100 raster that covers the projected extent of the source raster. However I'm not sure I really understand the rest of your comment. Perhaps if you edited your question and included some maps that would improve things. Commented May 12, 2019 at 22:18