Timeline for Great-circle lines in Equirectangular projection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2013 at 12:15 | history | edited | SO is dead | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 152 characters in body |
| Feb 27, 2013 at 9:05 | vote | accept | SO is dead | ||
| Feb 26, 2013 at 19:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGIS/status/306485708191834113 | ||
| Feb 26, 2013 at 18:31 | history | edited | whuber | edited tags | |
| Feb 26, 2013 at 18:31 | answer | added | whuber | timeline score: 15 | |
| Feb 26, 2013 at 17:53 | comment | added | SO is dead | Yes, one is redundant, but I don't have the formula ready. As noted, amplitude==0 implies offset=0; these two are obviously coupled. See updated question for the missing latitude to make the relationship well-formed. | |
| Feb 26, 2013 at 17:52 | history | edited | SO is dead | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 11 characters in body |
| Feb 26, 2013 at 17:49 | comment | added | whuber | Form #2 is not a set of (latitude, longitude) pairs. What does it mean? And why does it depend on three parameters (rotation, amplitude, and offset) when the great circles naturally have only two parameters (each one corresponds to a pair of diametrically opposite points that are "polar" to it)? | |
| Feb 26, 2013 at 17:46 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 26, 2013 at 18:04 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2013 at 17:28 | history | asked | SO is dead | CC BY-SA 3.0 |