Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
| Or we can maintain our current naming convention: type(scope): summary |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
| There are two options: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
| I think we can keep the current naming convention since most GitHub actions on the marketplace work with it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Let us define our pr naming convention, and there is a proposal:
Here is an example: apache/pulsar#21048
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions