Skip to content

bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo #237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo #237

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot commented Oct 12, 2020

Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=363589
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

kernel-patches-bot commented Oct 12, 2020

Master branch: 28802e7
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=363589
version: 1

Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=363589
error message:

Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128) cmdline: git am -3 stdout: 'Applying: bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... A	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c A	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge... CONFLICT (modify/delete): tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c deleted in HEAD and modified in bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo. Version bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo of tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c left in tree. CONFLICT (modify/delete): tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c deleted in HEAD and modified in bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo. Version bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo of tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c left in tree. Patch failed at 0001 bpf: selftest: Fix flaky tcp_hdr_options test when adding addr to lo When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".' stderr: 'error: Failed to merge in the changes. hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch'

conflict:

* Unmerged path tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c * Unmerged path tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

kernel-patches-bot commented Oct 15, 2020

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=363589 irrelevant now. Closing PR.
@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/363589=>bpf branch October 18, 2020 02:00
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2021
@willdeacon
arm64/mm: Drop THP conditionality from FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER
79cc2ed 
Currently without THP being enabled, MAX_ORDER via FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER gets reduced to 11, which falls below HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER for certain 16K and 64K page size configurations. This is problematic which throws up the following warning during boot as pageblock_order via HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER order exceeds MAX_ORDER. WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 127 at mm/vmstat.c:1092 __fragmentation_index+0x58/0x70 Modules linked in: CPU: 7 PID: 127 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-00005-g0221e3101a1 #237 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) pc : __fragmentation_index+0x58/0x70 lr : fragmentation_index+0x88/0xa8 sp : ffff800016ccfc00 x29: ffff800016ccfc00 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800011fd4000 x26: 0000000000000002 x25: ffff800016ccfda0 x24: 0000000000000002 x23: 0000000000000640 x22: ffff0005ffcb5b18 x21: 0000000000000002 x20: 000000000000000d x19: ffff0005ffcb3980 x18: 0000000000000004 x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 0000000000000019 x15: ffff800011ca7fb8 x14: 00000000000002b3 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000000005e0 x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0000000000000080 x9 : ffff800011c93948 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000007000 x5 : 0000000000007944 x4 : 0000000000000032 x3 : 000000000000001c x2 : 000000000000000b x1 : ffff800016ccfc10 x0 : 000000000000000d Call trace: __fragmentation_index+0x58/0x70 compaction_suitable+0x58/0x78 wakeup_kcompactd+0x8c/0xd8 balance_pgdat+0x570/0x5d0 kswapd+0x1e0/0x388 kthread+0x154/0x158 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30 This solves the problem via keeping FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER unchanged with or without THP on 16K and 64K page size configurations, making sure that the HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER (and pageblock_order) would never exceed MAX_ORDER. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614597914-28565-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
23f5107 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
99bc0ac 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
f455b6a 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
11a582b 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
1ae4892 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
30e6941 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
ee102fa 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
805502d 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
eae7937 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
ac69d03 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
25e8cc3 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
1425f00 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
27bca8c 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
f917f5d 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
472fcfd 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
7ec1c1f 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
31b5270 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump), result: #9 /1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK #9 /2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #9 /3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #9 /4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK #9 /5 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK #9 /6 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK #9 /7 bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK #9 /8 bpf_cookie/lsm:OK #9 bpf_cookie:FAIL #18 /1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK #18 /2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK #18 /3 bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK #18 /4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK #18 /5 bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK #18 bpf_tcp_ca:OK #51 /1 dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK #51 /2 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK #51 /3 dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK #51 /4 dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK #51 dummy_st_ops:OK #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #57 /1 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK #57 /2 fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK #57 /3 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK #57 /4 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK #57 /5 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK #57 /6 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK #57 /7 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK #57 /8 fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK #57 /9 fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK #57 fexit_bpf2bpf:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #104 modify_return:OK #237 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
197b593 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts attach, detach and query API: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] #237 tc_opts_after:OK #238 tc_opts_append:OK #239 tc_opts_basic:OK #240 tc_opts_before:OK #241 tc_opts_both:OK #242 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #243 tc_opts_demixed:OK #244 tc_opts_detach:OK #245 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #246 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #247 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #248 tc_opts_first:OK #249 tc_opts_invalid:OK #250 tc_opts_last:OK #251 tc_opts_mixed:OK #252 tc_opts_prepend:OK #253 tc_opts_replace:OK #254 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
yurinnick pushed a commit to yurinnick/kernel-patches-bpf that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
@borkmann @yurinnick
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
beabaad 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts attach, detach and query API: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] kernel-patches#237 tc_opts_after:OK kernel-patches#238 tc_opts_append:OK kernel-patches#239 tc_opts_basic:OK kernel-patches#240 tc_opts_before:OK kernel-patches#241 tc_opts_both:OK kernel-patches#242 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK kernel-patches#243 tc_opts_demixed:OK kernel-patches#244 tc_opts_detach:OK kernel-patches#245 tc_opts_detach_after:OK kernel-patches#246 tc_opts_detach_before:OK kernel-patches#247 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK kernel-patches#248 tc_opts_first:OK kernel-patches#249 tc_opts_invalid:OK kernel-patches#250 tc_opts_last:OK kernel-patches#251 tc_opts_mixed:OK kernel-patches#252 tc_opts_prepend:OK kernel-patches#253 tc_opts_replace:OK kernel-patches#254 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
87744a7 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts attach, detach and query API: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] #237 tc_opts_after:OK #238 tc_opts_append:OK #239 tc_opts_basic:OK #240 tc_opts_before:OK #241 tc_opts_both:OK #242 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #243 tc_opts_demixed:OK #244 tc_opts_detach:OK #245 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #246 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #247 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #248 tc_opts_first:OK #249 tc_opts_invalid:OK #250 tc_opts_last:OK #251 tc_opts_mixed:OK #252 tc_opts_prepend:OK #253 tc_opts_replace:OK #254 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
yurinnick pushed a commit to yurinnick/kernel-patches-bpf that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
@borkmann @yurinnick
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
3a26907 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts attach, detach and query API: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] kernel-patches#237 tc_opts_after:OK kernel-patches#238 tc_opts_append:OK kernel-patches#239 tc_opts_basic:OK kernel-patches#240 tc_opts_before:OK kernel-patches#241 tc_opts_both:OK kernel-patches#242 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK kernel-patches#243 tc_opts_demixed:OK kernel-patches#244 tc_opts_detach:OK kernel-patches#245 tc_opts_detach_after:OK kernel-patches#246 tc_opts_detach_before:OK kernel-patches#247 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK kernel-patches#248 tc_opts_first:OK kernel-patches#249 tc_opts_invalid:OK kernel-patches#250 tc_opts_last:OK kernel-patches#251 tc_opts_mixed:OK kernel-patches#252 tc_opts_prepend:OK kernel-patches#253 tc_opts_replace:OK kernel-patches#254 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
@sudeep-holla @oupton
KVM: arm64: Handle kvm_arm_init failure correctly in finalize_pkvm
fa729bc 
Currently there is no synchronisation between finalize_pkvm() and kvm_arm_init() initcalls. The finalize_pkvm() proceeds happily even if kvm_arm_init() fails resulting in the following warning on all the CPUs and eventually a HYP panic: | kvm [1]: IPA Size Limit: 48 bits | kvm [1]: Failed to init hyp memory protection | kvm [1]: error initializing Hyp mode: -22 | | <snip> | | WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c:226 _kvm_host_prot_finalize+0x30/0x50 | Modules linked in: | CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.4.0 #237 | Hardware name: FVP Base RevC (DT) | pstate: 634020c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : _kvm_host_prot_finalize+0x30/0x50 | lr : __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0xd8/0x230 | | Call trace: | _kvm_host_prot_finalize+0x3c/0x50 | on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x3c/0x6c | pkvm_drop_host_privileges+0x4c/0x78 | finalize_pkvm+0x3c/0x5c | do_one_initcall+0xcc/0x240 | do_initcall_level+0x8c/0xac | do_initcalls+0x54/0x94 | do_basic_setup+0x1c/0x28 | kernel_init_freeable+0x100/0x16c | kernel_init+0x20/0x1a0 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | Failed to finalize Hyp protection: -22 | dtb=fvp-base-revc.dtb | kvm [95]: nVHE hyp BUG at: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c:540! | kvm [95]: nVHE call trace: | kvm [95]: [<ffff800081052984>] __kvm_nvhe_hyp_panic+0xac/0xf8 | kvm [95]: [<ffff800081059644>] __kvm_nvhe_handle_host_mem_abort+0x1a0/0x2ac | kvm [95]: [<ffff80008105511c>] __kvm_nvhe_handle_trap+0x4c/0x160 | kvm [95]: [<ffff8000810540fc>] __kvm_nvhe___skip_pauth_save+0x4/0x4 | kvm [95]: ---[ end nVHE call trace ]--- | kvm [95]: Hyp Offset: 0xfffe8db00ffa0000 | Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic: | PS:a34023c9 PC:0000f250710b973c ESR:00000000f2000800 | FAR:ffff000800cb00d0 HPFAR:000000000880cb00 PAR:0000000000000000 | VCPU:0000000000000000 | CPU: 3 PID: 95 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G W 6.4.0 #237 | Hardware name: FVP Base RevC (DT) | Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0xec/0x108 | show_stack+0x18/0x2c | dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x68 | dump_stack+0x18/0x24 | panic+0x138/0x33c | nvhe_hyp_panic_handler+0x100/0x184 | new_slab+0x23c/0x54c | ___slab_alloc+0x3e4/0x770 | kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1f0/0x278 | __alloc_skb+0xdc/0x294 | tcp_stream_alloc_skb+0x2c/0xf0 | tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x3d0/0xda4 | tcp_sendmsg+0x38/0x5c | inet_sendmsg+0x44/0x60 | sock_sendmsg+0x1c/0x34 | xprt_sock_sendmsg+0xdc/0x274 | xs_tcp_send_request+0x1ac/0x28c | xprt_transmit+0xcc/0x300 | call_transmit+0x78/0x90 | __rpc_execute+0x114/0x3d8 | rpc_async_schedule+0x28/0x48 | process_one_work+0x1d8/0x314 | worker_thread+0x248/0x474 | kthread+0xfc/0x184 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | SMP: stopping secondary CPUs | Kernel Offset: 0x57c5cb460000 from 0xffff800080000000 | PHYS_OFFSET: 0x80000000 | CPU features: 0x00000000,1035b7a3,ccfe773f | Memory Limit: none | ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic: | PS:a34023c9 PC:0000f250710b973c ESR:00000000f2000800 | FAR:ffff000800cb00d0 HPFAR:000000000880cb00 PAR:0000000000000000 | VCPU:0000000000000000 ]--- Fix it by checking for the successfull initialisation of kvm_arm_init() in finalize_pkvm() before proceeding any futher. Fixes: 87727ba ("KVM: arm64: Ensure CPU PMU probes before pKVM host de-privilege") Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230704193243.3300506-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
dbd1540 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free"). # ./test_progs -t tc [...] #234 tc_links_after:OK #235 tc_links_append:OK #236 tc_links_basic:OK #237 tc_links_before:OK #238 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #239 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #240 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #241 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #242 tc_links_ingress:OK #243 tc_links_invalid:OK #244 tc_links_prepend:OK #245 tc_links_replace:OK #246 tc_links_revision:OK #247 tc_opts_after:OK #248 tc_opts_append:OK #249 tc_opts_basic:OK #250 tc_opts_before:OK #251 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #252 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #253 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #254 tc_opts_demixed:OK #255 tc_opts_detach:OK #256 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #257 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #258 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #259 tc_opts_invalid:OK #260 tc_opts_mixed:OK #261 tc_opts_prepend:OK #262 tc_opts_replace:OK #263 tc_opts_revision:OK [...] Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
4f741af 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free"). # ./test_progs -t tc [...] #234 tc_links_after:OK #235 tc_links_append:OK #236 tc_links_basic:OK #237 tc_links_before:OK #238 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #239 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #240 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #241 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #242 tc_links_ingress:OK #243 tc_links_invalid:OK #244 tc_links_prepend:OK #245 tc_links_replace:OK #246 tc_links_revision:OK #247 tc_opts_after:OK #248 tc_opts_append:OK #249 tc_opts_basic:OK #250 tc_opts_before:OK #251 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #252 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #253 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #254 tc_opts_demixed:OK #255 tc_opts_detach:OK #256 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #257 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #258 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #259 tc_opts_invalid:OK #260 tc_opts_mixed:OK #261 tc_opts_prepend:OK #262 tc_opts_replace:OK #263 tc_opts_revision:OK [...] Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
chantra pushed a commit to chantra/kernel-patches-bpf that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@borkmann @chantra
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
0e1fa14 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free"). # ./test_progs -t tc [...] kernel-patches#234 tc_links_after:OK kernel-patches#235 tc_links_append:OK kernel-patches#236 tc_links_basic:OK kernel-patches#237 tc_links_before:OK kernel-patches#238 tc_links_chain_classic:OK kernel-patches#239 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK kernel-patches#240 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK kernel-patches#241 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK kernel-patches#242 tc_links_ingress:OK kernel-patches#243 tc_links_invalid:OK kernel-patches#244 tc_links_prepend:OK kernel-patches#245 tc_links_replace:OK kernel-patches#246 tc_links_revision:OK kernel-patches#247 tc_opts_after:OK kernel-patches#248 tc_opts_append:OK kernel-patches#249 tc_opts_basic:OK kernel-patches#250 tc_opts_before:OK kernel-patches#251 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK kernel-patches#252 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK kernel-patches#253 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK kernel-patches#254 tc_opts_demixed:OK kernel-patches#255 tc_opts_detach:OK kernel-patches#256 tc_opts_detach_after:OK kernel-patches#257 tc_opts_detach_before:OK kernel-patches#258 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK kernel-patches#259 tc_opts_invalid:OK kernel-patches#260 tc_opts_mixed:OK kernel-patches#261 tc_opts_prepend:OK kernel-patches#262 tc_opts_replace:OK kernel-patches#263 tc_opts_revision:OK [...] Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
ccd9a8b 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free"). # ./test_progs -t tc [...] #234 tc_links_after:OK #235 tc_links_append:OK #236 tc_links_basic:OK #237 tc_links_before:OK #238 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #239 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #240 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #241 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #242 tc_links_ingress:OK #243 tc_links_invalid:OK #244 tc_links_prepend:OK #245 tc_links_replace:OK #246 tc_links_revision:OK #247 tc_opts_after:OK #248 tc_opts_append:OK #249 tc_opts_basic:OK #250 tc_opts_before:OK #251 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #252 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #253 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #254 tc_opts_demixed:OK #255 tc_opts_detach:OK #256 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #257 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #258 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #259 tc_opts_invalid:OK #260 tc_opts_mixed:OK #261 tc_opts_prepend:OK #262 tc_opts_replace:OK #263 tc_opts_revision:OK [...] Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8699efc284b75ccdc51ddf7062fa2370330dc6c0.1692029283.git.daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
feb378e 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
59792ed 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
dc8a42e 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
773ffae 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
aa6910c 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
66080f8 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for sleepable bpf_task_under_cgroup()
ec9f637 
The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED And no error messages in dmesg. Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
c2e625e 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
fd09939 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
92c2feb 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
586448d 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
5f57808 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
0902dff 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
9f699d4 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
dd9352b 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
c212a9c 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
9593448 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
2c95b7b 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
a4a60a4 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
@laoar
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
d441545 
…prog The result as follows, $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the prev patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with prev patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
@laoar @borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bpf_task_under_cgroup() in sleepable …
44cb03f 
…prog The result is as follows: $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=task_under_cgroup #237 task_under_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Without the previous patch, there will be RCU warnings in dmesg when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled. While with the previous patch, there will be no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231007135945.4306-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

accepted bpf V1

2 participants

@kernel-patches-bot