[clang-format] attribute on constructor causes -> to be incorrectly inferred as trailing return type in base class argument list #86559
Description
version 17.0.1 correctly formats this:
// --dump-config has // AttributeMacros: // - _COLD #define _COLD __attribute__((cold)) class C { public: __attribute__((cold)) C() : Base(obj->func()) {} // OK _COLD C() : Base(obj->func()) {} // OK C() : Base(obj->func()) {} // OK };whereas 18.1 and HEAD (d99cfa0) incorrectly think -> is introducing a trailing return type when the constructor has an attribute attached to it:
// --dump-config has // AttributeMacros: // - _COLD #define _COLD __attribute__((cold)) class C { public: __attribute__((cold)) C() : Base(obj -> func()) {} // WRONG _COLD C() : Base(obj -> func()) {} // WRONG C() : Base(obj->func()) {} // OK };