- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
[OpenMP] Add diagnostic for 'factor' width mismatch in 'unroll partial' #139986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
albus-droid wants to merge 8 commits into llvm:main Choose a base branch from albus-droid:fix-omp-unroll-partial-factor-width
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline, and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
2801d23 Added two conditions to check for width of the factor variable
albus-droid fd2cd3d Added diag error message and also formatted using clang-format
albus-droid cd13fc4 Added two test cases
albus-droid afeb2a5 Changed the Factor variable and Iterator Variable
albus-droid fd81da4 updated and added some new test cases
albus-droid 6132e2c Added the requested changes
albus-droid 191620b Added the requested formatting changes
albus-droid da1cb74 Update SemaOpenMP.cpp
albus-droid File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One question I have for @alexey-bataev and @shiltian is whether we should hoist the width-checking logic into
VerifyPositiveIntegerConstantInClause()so that all callers of this function get the same checking instead of just loop unroll directives. Won't all the callers of this function have the same need to diagnose width mismatches? (Apologies for my OpenMP ignorance, maybe I'm wrong.)