Skip to content

Conversation

@tbaederr
Copy link
Contributor

Adjust to the new way the ast walker is doing it.

@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang:bytecode Issues for the clang bytecode constexpr interpreter labels May 15, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 15, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

Changes

Adjust to the new way the ast walker is doing it.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140000.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp (+13)
  • (modified) clang/test/SemaCXX/consteval-assert.cpp (+7-3)
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp index bc860185fea21..ab4bd96b4f993 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp @@ -851,6 +851,19 @@ bool CheckCallable(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const Function *F) { if (F->isLambdaStaticInvoker()) return true; + // Diagnose failed assertions specially. + if (S.Current->getLocation(OpPC).isMacroID() && + F->getDecl()->getIdentifier()) { + StringRef Name = F->getDecl()->getName(); + bool AssertFailed = + Name == "__assert_rtn" || Name == "__assert_fail" || Name == "_wassert"; + if (AssertFailed) { + S.FFDiag(S.Current->getLocation(OpPC), + diag::note_constexpr_assert_failed); + return false; + } + } + if (S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) { const FunctionDecl *DiagDecl = F->getDecl(); diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/consteval-assert.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/consteval-assert.cpp index b54a38ff26105..8f0b9046518ee 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/consteval-assert.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/consteval-assert.cpp @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify=expected,cxx20_plus -DTEST_LINUX %s -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify=expected,cxx20_plus -DTEST_WINDOWS %s -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify=expected,cxx20_plus -DTEST_DARWIN %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify -DTEST_LINUX %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify -DTEST_WINDOWS %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify -DTEST_DARWIN %s + +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify -DTEST_LINUX %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify -DTEST_WINDOWS %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify -DTEST_DARWIN %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter #ifdef __ASSERT_FUNCTION #undef __ASSERT_FUNCTION 
Adjust to the new way the ast walker is doing it.
@tbaederr tbaederr merged commit 572add0 into llvm:main May 19, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clang:bytecode Issues for the clang bytecode constexpr interpreter clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category

3 participants