Skip to content

Conversation

@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mstorsjo mstorsjo added this to the LLVM 18.X Release milestone Feb 10, 2024
@llvmbot llvmbot added the lld label Feb 10, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 10, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld

Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81388.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+5)
diff --git a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst index fa0e7f2bc0b3ea..82f9d93b8e86ab 100644 --- a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst +++ b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ COFF Improvements * LLD now prefers library paths specified with ``-libpath:`` over the implicitly detected toolchain paths. +* Use the ``SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`` environment variable for the PE header and + debug directory timestamps, if neither the ``/Brepro`` nor ``/timestamp:`` + options have been specified. This makes the linker output reproducible by + setting this environment variable. + MinGW Improvements ------------------ 
@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member Author

This goes along with/after #81384 (which is approved but not yet merged).

@mstorsjo mstorsjo requested a review from MaskRay February 10, 2024 23:17
@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member Author

@tstellar Can this be merged? It has been approved. I'd like to add more release notes here, which would go on top of this.

@tstellar tstellar merged commit 8391421 into llvm:release/18.x Feb 16, 2024
@mstorsjo mstorsjo deleted the lld-source-date-epoch-relnotes branch February 16, 2024 09:12
@pointhex pointhex mentioned this pull request May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4 participants