Replies: 2 comments
-
| My point of view is that the law was shaped with the consent of big tech companies and in alignment with their interests. All of them already have, or are in the process of implementing, centralized user registration in their clouds in order to use their operating systems. In this case, the Brazilian law will create legal uncertainty for applications (games, for example) that do not integrate age verification with the operating systems. The easiest way out for apps will be to drop support for Linux and BSD, which by its nature will be unable to verify the age of its users. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
| Thanks for sharing this. Very interesting article. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I see that you guys are researching about age verification implementation in other to comply with several legislation. There's a clarifying article wrote by Luana Esteche Nunes. She's Lawyer, PhD candidate in Law (IDP), Master’s degree in Intellectual Property, researcher in public policy, digital regulation, and the protection of fundamental rights.
I'll cite her:
and also
The article: https://www.conjur.com.br/2026-mar-04/a-idade-deixou-de-ser-opiniao-o-eca-digital-e-o-fim-da-autodeclaracao-como-controle-regulatorio/
I recommend reading the article in full. From all the noise over the subject, I felt that this one is most insightful article as how legal experts and law enforcement will see the OS responsibility.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions