fix noqa comments

Author: jorisvandenbossche

pandas/api/extensions/__init__.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 """Public API for extending pandas objects."""
-from pandas.core.accessor import (
- register_dataframe_accessor, # noqa
+from pandas.core.accessor import ( # noqa
+ register_dataframe_accessor,
  register_index_accessor,
  register_series_accessor,
 )

pandas/api/types/__init__.py

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 """ public toolkit API """
 
 from pandas.core.dtypes.api import * # noqa
-from pandas.core.dtypes.dtypes import (
- CategoricalDtype, # noqa
+from pandas.core.dtypes.dtypes import ( # noqa
+ CategoricalDtype,
  DatetimeTZDtype,
  PeriodDtype,
  IntervalDtype,

pandas/tests/arrays/categorical/test_constructors.py

@@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ def test_constructor(self):
 
  # this is a legitimate constructor
  with tm.assert_produces_warning(None):
- c = Categorical(
- np.array([], dtype="int64"), categories=[3, 2, 1], ordered=True # noqa
+ c = Categorical( # noqa
+ np.array([], dtype="int64"), categories=[3, 2, 1], ordered=True
  )
 
  def test_constructor_with_existing_categories(self):

pandas/tests/extension/base/__init__.py

@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@ class TestMyDtype(BaseDtypeTests):
 from .methods import BaseMethodsTests # noqa
 from .ops import BaseArithmeticOpsTests, BaseComparisonOpsTests, BaseOpsUtil # noqa
 from .printing import BasePrintingTests # noqa
-from .reduce import (
+from .reduce import ( # noqa
  BaseNoReduceTests,
  BaseNumericReduceTests,
  BaseBooleanReduceTests,
-) # noqa
+)
 from .missing import BaseMissingTests # noqa
 from .reshaping import BaseReshapingTests # noqa
 from .setitem import BaseSetitemTests # noqa

pandas/tests/frame/test_alter_axes.py

@@ -238,9 +238,8 @@ def test_set_index_pass_arrays_duplicate(
  # cannot drop the same column twice;
  # use "is" because == would give ambiguous Boolean error for containers
  first_drop = (
- False if (keys[0] is "A" and keys[1] is "A") else drop
- ) # noqa: F632
-
+ False if (keys[0] is "A" and keys[1] is "A") else drop # noqa: F632
+ )
  # to test against already-tested behaviour, we add sequentially,
  # hence second append always True; must wrap keys in list, otherwise
  # box = list would be interpreted as keys

pandas/tests/frame/test_analytics.py

@@ -2116,8 +2116,8 @@ def test_round(self):
  nan_round_Series = Series({"col1": np.nan, "col2": 1})
 
  # TODO(wesm): unused?
- expected_nan_round = DataFrame(
- {"col1": [1.123, 2.123, 3.123], "col2": [1.2, 2.2, 3.2]} # noqa
+ expected_nan_round = DataFrame( # noqa
+ {"col1": [1.123, 2.123, 3.123], "col2": [1.2, 2.2, 3.2]}
  )
 
  with pytest.raises(TypeError):

pandas/tests/frame/test_query_eval.py

@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ def test_ops(self):
  ("/", "__truediv__", "__rtruediv__"),
  ]:
 
- base = DataFrame(
- np.tile(m.values, n).reshape(n, -1), columns=list("abcd") # noqa
+ base = DataFrame( # noqa
+ np.tile(m.values, n).reshape(n, -1), columns=list("abcd")
  )
 
  expected = eval("base{op}df".format(op=op_str))

pandas/tests/test_strings.py

@@ -1839,13 +1839,13 @@ def test_ismethods(self):
  digit_e = [False, False, False, True, False, False, False, True, False, False]
 
  # TODO: unused
- num_e = [
+ num_e = [ # noqa
  False,
  False,
  False,
  True,
  False,
- False, # noqa
+ False,
  False,
  True,
  False,