Skip to content

Conversation

@nathalier
Copy link
Contributor

@nathalier nathalier commented May 29, 2019

parsing.try_parse_year_month_day() in _attempt_YYYYMMDD() throws not only ValueError but also OverFlowError for incorrect dates. So handling of this error was added.

…as-dev#25512) parsing.try_parse_year_month_day() in _attempt_YYYYMMDD() throws not only ValueError but also OverFlowError for incorrect dates. So handling of this error was added.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26561 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #26561 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 91.77% 91.76% -0.01%  ========================================== Files 174 174 Lines 50649 50649 ========================================== - Hits 46483 46479 -4  - Misses 4166 4170 +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.3% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.69% <0%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py 85.05% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 93a67db...2d41f2f. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26561 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #26561 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 91.77% 91.77% -0.01%  ========================================== Files 174 174 Lines 50649 50681 +32 ========================================== + Hits 46483 46510 +27  - Misses 4166 4171 +5
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.3% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.68% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py 85.05% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
pandas/core/groupby/groupby.py 97.17% <0%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
pandas/core/groupby/__init__.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/indexes/base.py 96.71% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/base.py 98.19% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/indexes/interval.py 96.2% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/groupby/generic.py 89.08% <0%> (+0.11%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 93a67db...e32641e. Read the comment docs.

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins added Bug Datetime Datetime data dtype labels May 29, 2019
@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins requested a review from mroeschke May 29, 2019 12:05
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add a whatnew note, bug fixes, datetimes is good

result = to_datetime(s, format='%Y%m%d', cache=cache)
assert_series_equal(result, expected)

# GH 25512
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you make a new test (and _overflow) in the name

def test_to_datetime_format_YYYYMMDD_overflow(self, cache):
# GH 25512
# NaN before strings with invalid date values, errors=coerce
s = Series(['19801222', np.nan, '20010012', '10019999'])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you parameterize over these Series inputs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it what you meant?
Thanks!

@WillAyd WillAyd added this to the 0.25.0 milestone May 30, 2019
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm - nice job!

@jreback jreback merged commit 2630a0b into pandas-dev:master Jun 1, 2019
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 1, 2019

thanks @nathalier very nice.

note that this might close another existing issue or 2, though searching for issues like this are hard

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Datetime Datetime data dtype

5 participants