Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions asv_bench/benchmarks/rolling.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ def peakmem_rolling(self, constructor, window, dtype, method):
getattr(self.roll, method)()


class Apply:
params = (
["DataFrame", "Series"],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason not to just put (pd.DataFrame, pd.Series) and avoid the getattr?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was the nicest way to have it label nicely in the params and not be an if/else in the setup. Plus the getattr is in the setup so it won't impact the benchmark time.

[10, 1000],
["int", "float"],
[sum, np.sum, lambda x: np.sum(x) + 5],
[True, False],
)
param_names = ["contructor", "window", "dtype", "function", "raw"]

def setup(self, constructor, window, dtype, function, raw):
N = 10 ** 5
arr = (100 * np.random.random(N)).astype(dtype)
self.roll = getattr(pd, constructor)(arr).rolling(window)

def time_rolling(self, constructor, window, dtype, function, raw):
self.roll.apply(function, raw=raw)


class ExpandingMethods:

params = (
Expand Down