Use grad to compute jacobian when input shape is known to be (1,)

[jessegrabowski]

Description

Small optimization for pt.jacobian(x, *args). If x is known to be shape (1,), we should still use pt.grad rather than doing a scan.

Related Issue

• Closes #
• Related to #

Checklist

• Checked that the pre-commit linting/style checks pass
• Included tests that prove the fix is effective or that the new feature works
• Added necessary documentation (docstrings and/or example notebooks)
• If you are a pro: each commit corresponds to a relevant logical change

Type of change

• New feature / enhancement
• Bug fix
• Documentation
• Maintenance
• Other (please specify):

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pytensor--1454.org.readthedocs.build/en/1454/

[ricardoV94]

PR title is imprecise, any array with statically known size 1 now uses this, so shape=(1, ..., 1)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.12%. Comparing base (ff98ab8) to head (818b641).
⚠️ Report is 138 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1454 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 82.12% 82.12% ======================================= Files 211 211 Lines 49757 49757 Branches 8819 8819 ======================================= Hits 40862 40862 Misses 6715 6715 Partials 2180 2180 

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pytensor/gradient.py	78.55% <100.00%> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jessegrabowski]

PR title is imprecise, any array with statically known size 1 now uses this, so shape=(1, ..., 1)

No, because jacobian explicitly checks for ndim=1. So shape(1,1,1) will raise before we get to the change in this PR.

[ricardoV94]

PR title is imprecise, any array with statically known size 1 now uses this, so shape=(1, ..., 1)

No, because jacobian explicitly checks for ndim=1. So shape(1,1,1) will raise before we get to the change in this PR.

I think I'm my PR on vectorized I removed that constraint?