-
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.5k
bpo-35537: subprocess uses os.posix_spawn in some cases #11452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
cc999ff bpo-35537: subprocess uses os.posix_spawn in some cases
vstinner 634a523 Don't use glibc POSIX implementation
vstinner 2630276 Rephrase NEWS entry
vstinner 6474453 Merge branch 'master' into subprocess_spawn
vstinner f000375 Document optimization in What's New in Python 3.8
vstinner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions 2 Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2018-12-20-16-24-51.bpo-35537.z4E7aA.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| The :mod:`subprocess` module now uses the :func:`os.posix_spawn` function if | ||
| possible for better performance. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that the patch that added a pipe to the POSIX implementation also switched to unconditional use of
fork. Since the main motivation for usingposix_spawnappears to be performance benefits ofvfork, it seems that glibc's POSIX implementation shouldn't be used at all. I suggest to remove this branch.Otherwise, LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah. I didn't require to use vfork. But ok, I modified my PR to prefer posix_spawn() implementations which can use vfork in some cases for best performances. Let's start with a minimum platform support, and extend it later.