Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Can someone confirm that this RFC falls into first picture from this question: https://langdev.stackexchange.com/questions/4655/is-there-something-better-than-async-in-order-to-avoid-dead-or-unused-processing

The current implementation works like this:

  1. We have a Worker — the waiter.
  2. Inside the Worker, there are several coroutines — these are the orders.
  3. There is the kitchen, which is the database.

The kitchen is slow and requires time.
Therefore, one waiter (Worker) can handle several orders (requests) at the same time.

Laravel Octane, as far as I know, does not use coroutines. Therefore it doesn’t use all the capabilities that exist.
But perhaps after this RFC it will appear.

Replies: 1 comment 6 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
6 replies
@EdmondDantes
Comment options

@marius-ciclistu
Comment options

@marius-ciclistu
Comment options

@marius-ciclistu
Comment options

@EdmondDantes
Comment options

Answer selected by macropay-solutions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
3 participants