Skip to main content
deleted 37 characters in body
Jyrki Lahtonen
  • 142.5k
  • 31
  • 309
  • 745

TODO: answer questions from the voters Jyrki's answers to your questions


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

TODO: answer questions from the voters


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

Jyrki's answers to your questions


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

deleted 7 characters in body
Shog9
  • 101
  • 2
  • 8

TODO: answer questions from the voters TODO: answer questions from the voters


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

TODO: answer questions from the voters


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

TODO: answer questions from the voters


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

added 142 characters in body
Shog9
  • 101
  • 2
  • 8

TODO: answer questions from the voters


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

TODO: answer questions from the voters


Reporting for janitorial duty.

I have been at our site for three and a half years now and I'm totally addicted. Might as well try and give something back to the best math site I've ever seen.

The main reasons why I think I am a good choice are:

  • Math/career experience. I have been exposed to diverse corners of math, educational systems on both sides of the Atlantic, 25 years of teaching at college/university level, as well as interfacing with programmers/telcomm engineers during my shortish industry stint.
  • I like to think I'm moderate (don't we all?). I will occasionally get caught in a heated debate. But after the initial shockwave has passed I try to bury the hatchet and look for a compromise.

IMO my major shortcomings are:

  • Lack of time elsewhere in the SE network. I have never participated in our network wide meta, and thus I only have second hand exposure to SE philosophy. The moderators are our main link to SE staff, so I will have a lot to learn there. I have never moderated a site before.
  • I'm not sure about the level of my emotional intelligence - you be the judge.

If given a bigger broom to wield I will be more careful about how, when and where I sweep.

Jyrki Lahtonen
  • 142.5k
  • 31
  • 309
  • 745
Loading