Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 2, 2016 at 13:11 vote accept Aaron Hendrickson
Jul 25, 2016 at 15:28 vote accept Aaron Hendrickson
Aug 2, 2016 at 13:11
Jul 25, 2016 at 15:28 vote accept Aaron Hendrickson
Jul 25, 2016 at 15:28
Jul 25, 2016 at 12:28 history edited Harry Peter
edited tags
Jul 22, 2016 at 15:52 answer added Harry Peter timeline score: 3
Jul 13, 2016 at 23:00 vote accept Aaron Hendrickson
Jul 25, 2016 at 15:28
Jul 11, 2016 at 19:42 comment added Aaron Hendrickson Thanks Jack. I will take a look at it. It may be that there is no closed form solution. If no better answer arises I will accept what you posted.
Jul 11, 2016 at 17:14 comment added Jack D'Aurizio I carried on some computations for the general case, and I am left with a hypergeometric function as a main term and a series of $\phantom{}_{2} F_2$ functions as secondary term, that does not seem to simplify further. I hope that helps.
Jul 11, 2016 at 17:09 answer added Jack D'Aurizio timeline score: 1
Jul 11, 2016 at 14:24 history edited Aaron Hendrickson CC BY-SA 3.0
added 356 characters in body
Jul 11, 2016 at 14:17 comment added Aaron Hendrickson Jack, I have solved this problem for the case where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are integers using ibp where $u={_{1}}F_{1}(-\alpha;-\beta,-\lambda x)$ and $\mathrm{d}v = e^{ax}$. I could include that answer in the post but the answer is still a series as a result of using ibp. And i'm not sure how it will help me get to the general solution.
Jul 11, 2016 at 14:11 comment added Jack D'Aurizio If $\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{N}$, your hypergeometric function is just a polynomial and the closed form is straightforward to compute. It shouldn't be terribly difficult to generalize such closed form for non-integer values of $\alpha,\beta$.
Jul 11, 2016 at 14:07 history asked Aaron Hendrickson CC BY-SA 3.0