Timeline for Definition of significant figures
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 7:13 | comment | added | Ted | I don't understand the part where you say "Thus, using my two definitions of significant figures, we can claim that the addition between 9 and 2 results in one significant figure (at the tens place), rather than two significant figures one would get from the usual rule of thumb." The usual rule of thumb only says that you get one significant figure, not two, because both 9 and 2 only have one significant figure. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 6:37 | comment | added | FrustratedCollegeBoi | Even if that were the case, 9 could have been rounded up from 8.51 and 2 up from 1.51 or 9 down from 9.49 and 2 down from 2.49. Doing addition for both sets would give you 10.02 and 11.98, which still presents similar problem as that in my original post. Perhaps I am confused because I do not understand the rules for rounding and the greater context surrounding it. Can you comment on that? | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 6:06 | history | answered | Ted | CC BY-SA 3.0 |