Timeline for Relations as Sets
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2019 at 13:18 | answer | added | saulspatz | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 7, 2019 at 5:22 | history | edited | Andrés E. Caicedo | edited tags | |
| Jun 7, 2019 at 1:19 | answer | added | Arturo Magidin | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 7, 2019 at 1:12 | comment | added | Arturo Magidin | This is a relation between any set that contains $1$, $2$, and $3$, and any set that contains $1$, $2$, and $9$. It tells you that the $1$ in the first set is related to the $1$ in the second; that the $2$ in the first set is related to the $4$ in the second, and that the $3$ in the first set is related to the $9$ in the second. But you don’t speak of relations in the abstract, you speak of relation from one set $X$ to one set $Y$ (just like you don’t generally speak of “functions” without saying what the domain and codomain are, at least by convention). | |
| Jun 7, 2019 at 1:11 | comment | added | saulspatz | What is your definition of a relation? | |
| Jun 7, 2019 at 1:08 | history | asked | Frasch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |