Timeline for Why doesn't logic, math, physics etc have a symbol for "example"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2015 at 16:39 | vote | accept | Niklas Rosencrantz | ||
| Mar 31, 2013 at 6:39 | comment | added | Dan | There's also ✓, but that's only available to the asker. | |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 5:58 | comment | added | Raskolnikov | @Isaac: There is, it's that red upward arrow next to Zev's answer. ;) | |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 5:34 | comment | added | Zev Chonoles | @Steven: Yes, that's absolutely true; I was only answering the question in the context that I thought (hoped...?) the OP intended, namely, informal symbols. | |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 5:26 | comment | added | Steven Stadnicki | I should note out that you're avoiding the informal use of the $\forall$ symbol, and that that symbol has a formal use as a quantifier where it's difficult to avoid - for instance, talking about something like the $\exists\forall\exists$ sentences of a theory is much harder without the formal symbols... | |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 4:21 | comment | added | Elchanan Solomon | I wish there were a symbol for "great answer". | |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 3:29 | history | edited | Zev Chonoles | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 3 characters in body |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 2:56 | history | edited | Zev Chonoles | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 238 characters in body |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 2:45 | history | edited | Zev Chonoles | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 238 characters in body |
| Mar 31, 2013 at 2:36 | history | answered | Zev Chonoles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |